﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
    article-type="editorial" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="pt">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">regea</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Revista gestão em análise</journal-title>
                <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Gest. Anál.</abbrev-journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="ppub">1984-7297</issn>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2359-618X</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Unichristus</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/joms.12752.v14i3.p5-8.2025</article-id>
            <article-categories>
                <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
                    <subject>EDITORIAL</subject>
                </subj-group>
            </article-categories>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>PERIÓDICOS EMERGENTES NO CONTEXTO DE RUPTURA DO CICLO DA ESTAGNAÇÃO
                    EDITORIAL: INTEGRIDADE CIENTÍFICA COMO EIXO DE ANÁLISE</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Coelho</surname>
                        <given-names>Arnaldo</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Weersma</surname>
                        <given-names>Laodicéia</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub">
                <day>09</day>
                <month>02</month>
                <year>2026</year>
            </pub-date>
            <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
                <season>set./dez.</season>
                <year>2025</year>
            </pub-date>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <fpage>48</fpage>
            <lpage>64</lpage>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>Atransição promovida pela CAPES para o ciclo avaliativo 2025–2028 estabelece um marco
            decisivo na forma como a produção científica brasileira passa a ser compreendida,
            avaliada e posicionada no ecossistema acadêmico. Ao deslocar o foco do periódico para o
            artigo individual, inaugura-se um paradigma que exige dos periódicos emergentes, como a
                <italic>Revista Gestão em Análise e Tecnologias (ReGeA),</italic> não apenas
            adaptação técnica, mas também reposicionamento estratégico. Essa mudança produz impacto
            imediato: ao desvincular-se do Qualis tradicional como eixo central de referência,
            fortalece-se o protagonismo da qualidade intrínseca de cada artigo como critério
            fundamental de avaliação, impacto e circulação do conhecimento.</p>
        <p>Para periódicos que ainda não dispõem de elevada citabilidade ou forte indexação
            internacional, o novo modelo impõe desafios expressivos. A competição por manuscritos de
            alto nível tende a intensificar-se, o que torna indispensáveis o rigor editorial, a
            solidez metodológica e a clareza do escopo. Esses elementos são fundamentais para romper
            o ciclo de estagnação editorial – caracterizado por baixa citabilidade, retração de
            submissões qualificadas, ingresso de manuscritos frágeis e consequente baixo impacto
                (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">CAPES, 2025</xref>).</p>
        <p>A integridade científica deve ser compreendida como um bem público sustentado por
            responsabilidade coletiva, o que ultrapassa a dimensão da conduta individual do
            pesquisador. Conforme argumentam <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Tsui e McKiernan
                (2022)</xref> e <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Bouter (2024)</xref>, a integridade
            se materializa na construção de ambientes editoriais e institucionais capazes de
            assegurar, de forma articulada, a liberdade científica com responsabilidade,
            transparência nos processos de avaliação e publicação, a abertura à diversidade
            epistemológica e o compromisso efetivo com o interesse público. É importante perceber
            que esses argumentos se alinham diretamente com as diretrizes do sistema avaliativo
            CAPES 2025–2028, ao reconhecerem que a credibilidade do conhecimento científico depende
            das condições institucionais que sustentam sua produção e disseminação.</p>
        <p>É nesse horizonte de transformações que a ReGeA tem avançado. Em 2025, diante do
            crescente protagonismo das áreas tecnológicas no desenvolvimento social, produtivo e
            organizacional, o Comitê de Políticas Editoriais reafirmou seu compromisso com a
            excelência e com a integridade na comunicação científica ao ampliar o escopo da revista
            para contemplar pesquisas das ciências e tecnologias. A revista passou a acolher estudos
            sobre inovação, sistemas de informação, engenharia aplicada, tecnologias digitais,
            soluções inteligentes e sustentabilidade tecnológica, entre outras temáticas emergentes
            diretamente relacionadas aos desafios contemporâneos. Essa evolução marcou a transição
            de um periódico centrado exclusivamente em gestão para um modelo integrado que abrange
            contribuições da gestão e das tecnologias, culminando na adoção do nome <italic>Revista
                Gestão em Análise e Tecnologias (ReGeA).</italic></p>
        <p>Em 2026, o periódico adotará o fluxo contínuo para submissão e a publicação de artigos,
            ensaios e casos de ensino e continuará preservando o acesso aberto e a isenção completa
            de taxas de submissão, processamento e publicação. Essa política reafirma o compromisso
            da ReGeA com a democratização do conhecimento científico e com a eliminação de barreiras
            que limitam o acesso e a disseminação da produção acadêmica, alinhando-se à concepção de
            que a ciência deve servir ao interesse público. Por fim, desejamos uma excelente leitura
            e pesquisa aos nossos leitores.</p>
    </body>
    <back>
        <ref-list>
            <title>REFERENCES</title>
            <ref id="B1">
                <mixed-citation>BOUTER, Lex. Why research integrity matters and how it can be
                    improved. <bold>Accountability in Research,</bold> [s. l.], v. 31, n. 8, p.
                    1277-1286, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2189010.</mixed-citation>
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>BOUTER</surname>
                            <given-names>Lex</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Why research integrity matters and how it can be
                        improved</article-title>
                    <source>Accountability in Research</source>
                    <volume>31</volume>
                    <issue>8</issue>
                    <fpage>1277</fpage>
                    <lpage>1286</lpage>
                    <year>2024</year>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/08989621.2023.2189010</pub-id>
                    <comment>[s. l.]</comment>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B2">
                <mixed-citation>CAPES – Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education
                    Personnel. <bold>Area Document:</bold> Public and Business Administration,
                    Accounting Sciences and Tourism – Evaluation 2025–2028. Brasília: CAPES,
                    2025.</mixed-citation>
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <collab>CAPES – Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education
                            Personnel</collab>
                    </person-group>
                    <source><bold>Area Document:</bold> Public and Business Administration,
                        Accounting Sciences and Tourism – Evaluation 2025–2028</source>
                    <publisher-loc>Brasília</publisher-loc>
                    <publisher-name>CAPES</publisher-name>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B3">
                <mixed-citation>TSUI, Anne S.; McKIERAN, Peter. Understanding scientific freedom and
                    scientific responsibility in business and management research. <bold>Journal of
                        Management Studies,</bold> [s. l.], v. 59, n. 1, p. 1-19,
                    2022.</mixed-citation>
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>TSUI</surname>
                            <given-names>Anne S.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>McKIERAN</surname>
                            <given-names>Peter</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Understanding scientific freedom and scientific responsibility in
                        business and management research</article-title>
                    <source>Journal of Management Studies</source>
                    <volume>59</volume>
                    <issue>1</issue>
                    <fpage>1</fpage>
                    <lpage>19</lpage>
                    <year>2022</year>
                    <comment>[s. l.]</comment>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
        </ref-list>
    </back>
    <sub-article article-type="translation" id="s1" xml:lang="en">
        <front-stub>
            <article-categories>
                <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
                    <subject>EDITORIAL</subject>
                </subj-group>
            </article-categories>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>EMERGING JOURNALS IN THE CONTEXT OF BREAKING THE CYCLE OF EDITORIAL
                    STAGNATION: SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY AS AN AXIS OF ANALYSIS</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Coelho</surname>
                        <given-names>Arnaldo</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Weersma</surname>
                        <given-names>Laodicéia</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
        </front-stub>
        <body>
            <p>The transition promoted by CAPES for the 2025–2028 evaluation cycle represents a
                decisive milestone in how Brazilian scientific production will be understood,
                assessed, and positioned within the academic ecosystem. By shifting the focus from
                the journal to the individual article, a new paradigm is established that requires
                emerging journals, such as the Journal of Management in Analysis and Technologies
                (ReGeA), not only technical adaptation but also strategic repositioning. This change
                has an immediate impact: by moving away from the traditional Qualis system as the
                central reference, it strengthens the protagonism of the intrinsic quality of each
                article as a fundamental criterion for evaluation, impact, and knowledge
                circulation..</p>
            <p>For journals that do not yet enjoy high citation rates or strong international
                indexing, the new model imposes significant challenges. Competition for high-quality
                manuscripts tends to intensify, making editorial rigor, methodological robustness,
                and clarity of scope indispensable. These elements are essential to break the cycle
                of editorial stagnation – characterized by low citability, reduced submission of
                qualified manuscripts, the inflow of weak papers, and consequently low impact (<xref
                    ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">CAPES, 2025</xref>).</p>
            <p>Scientific integrity should be understood as a public good grounded in collective
                responsibility, going beyond the dimension of individual researcher conduct. As
                argued by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Tsui and McKiernan (2022)</xref> and <xref
                    ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Bouter (2024)</xref>, integrity materializes through
                the construction of editorial and institutional environments capable of ensuring, in
                an articulated manner, scientific freedom with responsibility, transparency in
                evaluation and publication processes, openness to epistemological diversity, and a
                firm commitment to the public interest. It is important to recognize that these
                arguments are directly aligned with the guidelines of the CAPES 2025–2028 evaluation
                system, insofar as they acknowledge that the credibility of scientific knowledge
                depends on the institutional conditions that support its production and
                dissemination.</p>
            <p>It is within this horizon oftransformations that ReGeA has advanced. In 2025, in view
                ofthe growing prominence of technological areas in social, productive, and
                organizational development, the Editorial Policy Committee reaffirmed its commitment
                to excellence and integrity in scientific communication by expanding the journal’s
                scope to include research from the sciences and technologies. The journal began to
                welcome studies on innovation, information systems, applied engineering, digital
                technologies, intelligent solutions, and technological sustainability, among other
                emerging themes directly related to contemporary challenges. This evolution marked
                the transition from a journal focused exclusively on management to an integrated
                model encompassing contributions from both management and technologies, culminating
                in the adoption of the name Journal of Management in Analysis and Technologies
                (ReGeA).</p>
            <p>In 2026, the journal will adopt a continuous flow model for the submission and
                publication of articles, essays, and teaching cases and will continue to preserve
                open access and the complete exemption of submission, processing, and publication
                fees. This policy reaffirms ReGeA’s commitment to the democratization of scientific
                knowledge and to the removal of barriers that limit access to and dissemination of
                academic production, aligning with the conception that science should serve the
                public interest. Moreover, we wish our readers an excellent reading and research
                experience.</p>
        </body>
    </sub-article>
</article>
