Prevalence of calcified triticeous cartilage-compatible images on 2500 digital panoramic radiographs of a Brazilian population sample

Autores

  • Guilherme Costa Soares Federal University of Ceara
  • Lúcio Mitsuo Kurita Federal University of Ceara
  • Ana Paula Negreiros Nunes Alves Federal University of Ceara
  • Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva Federal University of Ceara
  • Juliana Mara Oliveira Santos Hospital Geral de Fortaleza
  • Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa Federal University of Ceara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v8i1.3175.p1-6.2020

Palavras-chave:

Prevalence, Cartilage, Panoramic Radiography, Physiologic Calcification

Resumo

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of calcified triticeous cartilage (CTC)-compatible images on digital panoramic radiographs of a significant Brazilian population sample. Methods: In this retrospective study, 2500 digital panoramic radiographs were analyzed by a trained examiner using contrast and brightness adjustments of the Adobe® Photoshop® CC 2015 software. Data were collected and exported for statistical analysis (p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant). Results: The prevalence of CTC-compatible images was 4.5% (61.1% in women and 38.9% in men). The most prevalent age ranged between 51 and 60 years (32.7%), and bilateral occurrence had a higher prevalence (46.9%). Women between the ages of 61 and 70 years showed a significantly higher prevalence of CTC-compatible images (p=0.027). Conclusion: This study showed a low prevalence of CTC-compatible images, which mainly occurred in women close to 70 years of age.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Publicado

2020-11-04

Como Citar

1.
Soares GC, Kurita LM, Alves APNN, Silva PG de B, Santos JMO, Costa FWG. Prevalence of calcified triticeous cartilage-compatible images on 2500 digital panoramic radiographs of a Brazilian population sample. J Health Biol Sci. [Internet]. 4º de novembro de 2020 [citado 4º de novembro de 2024];8(1):1-6. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/article/view/3175