EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF WATERFALL AND AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGIES – A CASE STUDY FROM MACAU'S CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12662/2359-618xregea.v12i1.p23-38.2023Keywords:
project management methodologies, agile, PMBOK, construction industryAbstract
The adoption of project management techniques is a crucial decision for corporate governance in construction companies since the management of areas such as risk, cost, and communications is essential for the success or failure of an endeavor. Nevertheless, different frameworks based on traditional or agile methodologies are available with several approaches, which may create several ways to manage projects. The primary purpose of this work is to investigate the adequate project management methodology for the construction industry from a general perspective and consider a case study from Macau. The methodology considered semi-structured interviews and a survey comparing international and local project managers from the construction industry. The interviews indicate that most construction project managers still follow empirical methods with no specific methodology but consider the adoption of traditional waterfall approaches. In contrast, according to the survey, most project managers and construction managers agree that the project's efficacy needs to increase, namely in planning, waste minimization, communication increase, and focus on the Client's feedback. In addition, there seems to be a clear indication that agile methodology could be implemented in several types of projects, including hospitality development projects. A hybrid development approach based on the Waterfall and Agile methodologies as a tool for the project management area may provide a more suitable methodology for project managers to follow.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal Of Management Analysis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AGREEMENT FOR THE CESSION OF AUTHOR’S RIGHTS
Through the present instrument, on the one hand, CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO CHRISTUS – UNICHRISTUS, henceforth referred to only as UNICHRISTUS, and, on the other,
1) Name _________________________________, ID number _______________________________,
2) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
3) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
4) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
5) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
henceforth referred to only as AUTHOR of the academic article whose title is ______________________________________, agree, in the best legal form, what follows:
ARTICLE FIRST – ON THE CESSION
The AUTHOR, their heirs and successors, in the terms of art. 49 of Law 9.610/98, cede the WORK for reproduction, publicizing, distribution, printing and publication by UNICHRISTUS, in any form or mean that exists or may come to exist.
Paragraph One. The aforementioned cession is non-exclusive and gratuitous, encompassing the totality of the WORK.
Paragraph Two. UNICHRISTUS may make the WORK available, in part or in total, for academic purposes, and is prohibited from altering its content, except for formal corrections that may be necessary.
Paragraph Three. The cession is valid in all countries, for versions in Portuguese or any translations to other languages, as UNICHRISTUS sees fit.
Paragraph Four. The original manuscript shall be delivered in the form indicated by UNICHRISTUS.
ARTICLE TWO – ON THE RESPONSIBILITIES
The AUTHOR declares that the WORK is theirs and is previously unpublished and is responsible for its contents and form, citations, references and other elements that compose it, having delivered it, when signing the present document, with the necessary language and methodology revision. As such, any judicial or extrajudicial measures relating to the content are of their entire responsibility.
Paragraph One. The AUTHOR declares there is no tacit prohibition attached to the publicizing of the WORK, and that it is free of any onus or impediments before Brazilian law.
Paragraph Two. Any burden relating to eviction belongs to the AUTHOR, who will also be responsible for compensating UNICHRISTUS, in case it is harmed by any judicial or extrajudicial means relating to the content of the work.
Paragraph Three. In case the work has multiple authors, they will be responsible in solidarity, except when proven otherwise.
ARTICLE THREE – ON JUDICIAL REPRESENTATION
The AUTHOR hereby constitutes UNICHRISTUS as their representative, thus authorizing it to act judicially or extra judicially on their behalf in cases relating to attacks against the WORK, be it by illegal reproduction, fraudulent edition or any form that constitutes an assault to intellectual property.
ARTICLE FOUR – FORUM
The parties hereby elect the forum of Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, and renounce all others, as advantageous as they may be.
And because they deem the current agreement to be fair and just, the parties sign the present document in two copies.
Fortaleza, Ceará, on this ___ day of __________, 20__.
1) __________________________________________
2) __________________________________________
3) __________________________________________
4) __________________________________________
5) __________________________________________
Representing Centro Universitário Christus – UNICHRISTUS:
__________________________________________
