SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TRADITIONAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION MECHANISM IN PRESENT SOCIAL SCENARIO: A CASE STUDY OF ETHIOPIAN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12662/2359-618xregea.v9i2.p7-22.2020Keywords:
Conflict Resolution, Legal Protection, Gada, Behavioral Action, Social Network Analysis ConflictAbstract
Traditional conflict resolution mechanisms can play a significant role in conflict management which has gained widespread acceptance among both the general public and the legal protection in recent years. Some courts now gain some parties to resort to traditional conflict resolution mechanisms. Before permitting the parties case to be tried expressly contemplate to called compulsory mediation, while the general objective of this study is to assess traditional conflict resolution mechanism and the specific objective include collecting the data. This study used interviews and personal observation; both qualitative and quantitative data have used. The finding of the study revealed that traditional conflict resolution mechanisms had gained widespread acceptance, because of its application and its benefits. TCRM is the most effective way of conflict resolution rather than constitutional litigation. Lastly, as a recommendation, TCRM should be encouraged because it has an economic and social benefit for the society and also others like political advantages. TCRM eliminates expenses among disputants from incurring prosecution cost, writing cost, transportation cost; it strengths the solidarity of the two disputants because both of them are winners in TCRM. To mean that they are not victims of expending much cost. Another aim of this study is to examine the conflicts in the world by using social network analysis method. In the study, the conflict data obtained from the GDELT data set between 1981-2020 were analyzed using the “igraph” package of the R software. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that the two biggest actors in the conflicts in the world are the USA and Russia, respectively. From these results, it can be said that almost all of the conflicts in the world are related to these two countries. In the social network analysis for the discovery of the relationship between the conflicts in the world, in the criteria calculated to determine the position of Ethiopia, to explain its place among the countries and to make inferences about the whole network; The numerical data related to the centrality criteria of the Ethiopia network were found as Grade Center 1, Proximity Center (Normalized) 0.0217391 and Between Center 0.000000. Based on these data, it can be said that Ethiopia is not very connected (correlated) with other countries and is not an actor in the formation of conflicts in the world. Also, the results showed that the biggest actor in the cluster of 31 nodes is the USA. Again from this result, it is concluded that the biggest power in the world today is the USA.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal Of Management Analysis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AGREEMENT FOR THE CESSION OF AUTHOR’S RIGHTS
Through the present instrument, on the one hand, CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO CHRISTUS – UNICHRISTUS, henceforth referred to only as UNICHRISTUS, and, on the other,
1) Name _________________________________, ID number _______________________________,
2) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
3) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
4) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
5) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
henceforth referred to only as AUTHOR of the academic article whose title is ______________________________________, agree, in the best legal form, what follows:
ARTICLE FIRST – ON THE CESSION
The AUTHOR, their heirs and successors, in the terms of art. 49 of Law 9.610/98, cede the WORK for reproduction, publicizing, distribution, printing and publication by UNICHRISTUS, in any form or mean that exists or may come to exist.
Paragraph One. The aforementioned cession is non-exclusive and gratuitous, encompassing the totality of the WORK.
Paragraph Two. UNICHRISTUS may make the WORK available, in part or in total, for academic purposes, and is prohibited from altering its content, except for formal corrections that may be necessary.
Paragraph Three. The cession is valid in all countries, for versions in Portuguese or any translations to other languages, as UNICHRISTUS sees fit.
Paragraph Four. The original manuscript shall be delivered in the form indicated by UNICHRISTUS.
ARTICLE TWO – ON THE RESPONSIBILITIES
The AUTHOR declares that the WORK is theirs and is previously unpublished and is responsible for its contents and form, citations, references and other elements that compose it, having delivered it, when signing the present document, with the necessary language and methodology revision. As such, any judicial or extrajudicial measures relating to the content are of their entire responsibility.
Paragraph One. The AUTHOR declares there is no tacit prohibition attached to the publicizing of the WORK, and that it is free of any onus or impediments before Brazilian law.
Paragraph Two. Any burden relating to eviction belongs to the AUTHOR, who will also be responsible for compensating UNICHRISTUS, in case it is harmed by any judicial or extrajudicial means relating to the content of the work.
Paragraph Three. In case the work has multiple authors, they will be responsible in solidarity, except when proven otherwise.
ARTICLE THREE – ON JUDICIAL REPRESENTATION
The AUTHOR hereby constitutes UNICHRISTUS as their representative, thus authorizing it to act judicially or extra judicially on their behalf in cases relating to attacks against the WORK, be it by illegal reproduction, fraudulent edition or any form that constitutes an assault to intellectual property.
ARTICLE FOUR – FORUM
The parties hereby elect the forum of Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, and renounce all others, as advantageous as they may be.
And because they deem the current agreement to be fair and just, the parties sign the present document in two copies.
Fortaleza, Ceará, on this ___ day of __________, 20__.
1) __________________________________________
2) __________________________________________
3) __________________________________________
4) __________________________________________
5) __________________________________________
Representing Centro Universitário Christus – UNICHRISTUS:
__________________________________________
