CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN STATE COURTS OF JUSTICE
AN ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE LOGISTICS PLANS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12662/2359-618xregea.v13i3.p138-156.2024Keywords:
sustainability, circular economy, ReSOLVE, judiciary, sustainable logistics planAbstract
This article aims to categorize circular aspects in the current Sustainable Logistics Plans (SLP) of the Brazilian Courts of Justice. The method involves documentary research to identify all the goals of the SLPs in force in the 27 state courts. Next, the goals were coded using the six dimensions of the ReSOLVE framework. A total of 607 current goals were identified in the SLPs, with a predominance of goals for resource optimization (66.2%) and lower recurrence in the dimensions of sharing (0.3%) and regenerating (1.5%). The coding points out that SLPs can promote circularity in Courts by reducing material consumption, replacing equipment, sharing resources, and disposing of waste correctly. The Courts of Justice of the State of Tocantins and Federal District are benchmarking for future sustainable logistics plans based on the number of goals in their current plans. As a practical implication, the study highlights the importance of public infrastructure and collaboration policies towards the adoption of circular models. It also points out that the standardization of SLPs between the Courts could facilitate the monitoring of goals by the National Council of Justice (CNJ) and the population in general.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal Of Management Analysis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AGREEMENT FOR THE CESSION OF AUTHOR’S RIGHTS
Through the present instrument, on the one hand, CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO CHRISTUS – UNICHRISTUS, henceforth referred to only as UNICHRISTUS, and, on the other,
1) Name _________________________________, ID number _______________________________,
2) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
3) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
4) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
5) Name _________________________________,ID number _______________________________,
henceforth referred to only as AUTHOR of the academic article whose title is ______________________________________, agree, in the best legal form, what follows:
ARTICLE FIRST – ON THE CESSION
The AUTHOR, their heirs and successors, in the terms of art. 49 of Law 9.610/98, cede the WORK for reproduction, publicizing, distribution, printing and publication by UNICHRISTUS, in any form or mean that exists or may come to exist.
Paragraph One. The aforementioned cession is non-exclusive and gratuitous, encompassing the totality of the WORK.
Paragraph Two. UNICHRISTUS may make the WORK available, in part or in total, for academic purposes, and is prohibited from altering its content, except for formal corrections that may be necessary.
Paragraph Three. The cession is valid in all countries, for versions in Portuguese or any translations to other languages, as UNICHRISTUS sees fit.
Paragraph Four. The original manuscript shall be delivered in the form indicated by UNICHRISTUS.
ARTICLE TWO – ON THE RESPONSIBILITIES
The AUTHOR declares that the WORK is theirs and is previously unpublished and is responsible for its contents and form, citations, references and other elements that compose it, having delivered it, when signing the present document, with the necessary language and methodology revision. As such, any judicial or extrajudicial measures relating to the content are of their entire responsibility.
Paragraph One. The AUTHOR declares there is no tacit prohibition attached to the publicizing of the WORK, and that it is free of any onus or impediments before Brazilian law.
Paragraph Two. Any burden relating to eviction belongs to the AUTHOR, who will also be responsible for compensating UNICHRISTUS, in case it is harmed by any judicial or extrajudicial means relating to the content of the work.
Paragraph Three. In case the work has multiple authors, they will be responsible in solidarity, except when proven otherwise.
ARTICLE THREE – ON JUDICIAL REPRESENTATION
The AUTHOR hereby constitutes UNICHRISTUS as their representative, thus authorizing it to act judicially or extra judicially on their behalf in cases relating to attacks against the WORK, be it by illegal reproduction, fraudulent edition or any form that constitutes an assault to intellectual property.
ARTICLE FOUR – FORUM
The parties hereby elect the forum of Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, and renounce all others, as advantageous as they may be.
And because they deem the current agreement to be fair and just, the parties sign the present document in two copies.
Fortaleza, Ceará, on this ___ day of __________, 20__.
1) __________________________________________
2) __________________________________________
3) __________________________________________
4) __________________________________________
5) __________________________________________
Representing Centro Universitário Christus – UNICHRISTUS:
__________________________________________
