LAW AND ORDER: FROM LITERARY RHETORIC TO JURIDICAL RHETORIC

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i29.p265-284.2020

Keywords:

Legal methodology, Rhetoric, Art and Law, Order, Francisco Puy

Abstract

Objective: The analysis of the slogan “law and order” is related with the reading process of literary texts or cinematographic texts, applying them to the process of reading legal facts, highlighting the importance of the order of facts to the interpretation of facts.

Methodology: Several types of demonstration have been used: deductive arguments, based on rhetorical studies, in Literature, Art and Law, on the distortion operated by the order of factors; inductive arguments, which bring the legal analysis of discourses closer to artistic discourses, which have always reflected the importance of the order of the narrated factors; analogic arguments, presupposed by the omnipresence of faction in human sciences; and authority arguments, mainly referring the importance of the rhetorical work of a Spanish jurist, Francisco Puy.

Results: The essay underlines the importance of the order during the testimony or the process in general, given its rhetorical effects of conformation and / or manipulation.

Contributions: It is believed that the two main contributions of this research are the valorization of rhetorical studies in general (and of lawyers like Francisco Puy in particular), as well as the appreciation of a humanistic education of jurists, so often formed in the belief of this rhetorical neutrality of interpretation the facts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria Luísa Malato, Universidade do Porto

Professora Associada, com Agregação, na Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto. Com vários estudos sobre Utopia, Teatro e Retórica, a sua investigação debruça-se essencialmente sobre a literatura dos séculos XVIII e XIX. Tem Mestrado (1988, pela Universidade de Coimbra) Doutoramento e Agregação (1999 e 2007, pela Universidade do Porto) em Literatura Comparada e Estudos Românicos. Numa perspetiva comparatística, os seus trabalhos visam comprovar a necessidade de uma prática que alargue o corpus de análise às relações que a Literatura estabelece com a Filosofia, os textos impressos com os textos manuscritos, os autores canónicos com os "menores". É, desde 1990, sócia da Sociedade Francesa de Estudos do Século XVIII. Membro ativo do Instituto de Literatura Comparada Margarida Losa e colaboradora do Instituto de Filosofia (UP) e Centro de Estudos de Teatro (UL), unidades financiadas pela FCT. Vice-Presidente da Associação Portuguesa de Literatura Comparada (2013-2018). Co-editora da Revista online de Filosofia e Literatura Pontes de Vista.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-18

How to Cite

MALATO, Maria Luísa. LAW AND ORDER: FROM LITERARY RHETORIC TO JURIDICAL RHETORIC. Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza), Fortaleza, v. 18, n. 29, p. 265–284, 2020. DOI: 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i29.p265-284.2020. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3457. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 29 (2020)

Section

Artigos Originais

License

CESSION OF COPYRIGHTS

The submission of articles to analysis for publication on Opinião Jurídica implies the author(s) transfers copyrights to Centro Universitário Christus – UNICHRISTUS for reproduction, publicizing, distribution, printing and publication, according to the Publication Norm 414R, Opin. Jur., Fortaleza, year 12, n. 16, p.1-414, Jan./Dec. 2014, costs to be bore by UNICHRISTUS, in whatever format or means that may or shall exist, in accordance to articles 49 and following of Federal Law 9.610/98.

1. In ceding copyrights, the author(s) agrees to do so in exclusivity, free of charge and for the totality of the work.

2. UNICHRISTUS may make the work, in its entirety or in parts, available for scholarly purposes, without altering its contents, except for small corrections that are deemed necessary.

3. The cession of copyrights is valid in all countries and for versions of the material in its original language or translated into a foreign language.

RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENT

By submitting an article, the author(s) declare to have sole responsibility for the content of the piece and is(are), therefore, responsible for any judicial or extrajudicial measures referring to it.

1. In case of joint authorship, all authors are considered collectively responsible, except when proved otherwise.