THE FIRST PRINCIPLE OF PRACTICAL REASON IN THOMAS AQUINAS

THE CONTEMPORARY DEBATE ON THE STARTING POINT OF NATURAL LAW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v22i40.p25-44.2024

Keywords:

natural law, first principle of practical reason, new school of natural law, Thomas Aquinas

Abstract

Objective: This article investigates Thomas Aquinas' theory of natural law. Specifically, it aims to (1) expose how Aquinas approaches the first principle of practical reason; (2) expose the interpretation that the philosophers and legal philosophers constituting the New School of Natural Law offer regarding the aforementioned principle; (3) expose the main disagreements regarding the interpretation of the New School of Natural Law; (4) argue why the New School's interpretation fits Aquinas's approach; and (5) expose the difficulties in alternative interpretations.

Method: Theoretical and reflective approach according to authorized and updated bibliography. It uses the lessons of Thomas Aquinas and his contemporary interpreters, with emphasis on those who constitute the New School of Natural Law.

Result: Traditional derivationist positions are not able to adequately explain human acts. And this is because they do not explain the practical directive provided by the first practical principle in an act considered immoral. Furthermore, an additional hermeneutical argument is presented in favor of the interpretation of the New School of Natural Law regarding the first practical principle in Aquinas: considering the undeniable influence of Aristotle on Aquinas's work and a relative continuity between both, it is clear that there is a very similar thesis defended by both – formulated in different ways – and which makes the interpretation of the neoclassical theory of natural law more consistent. Thus, the role of the first principle of practical reason is understood as a structuring and directive principle of human acts in general, whether for acts considered morally appropriate or for acts considered morally inadequate.

Contributions: The following lines bring together preliminary notes, notwithstanding technical ones. Its contribution goes back to the necessary advancement of studies attentive to the structure of human reason, which has a theoretical aspect, which seeks to know the truth of things and philosophical propositions, and a practical aspect, which seeks to guide human acts towards certain ends. Furthermore, this article also contributes to the gaps in national literature at a philosophical-legal and ethical level, making it indispensable for a holistic view of the lessons of the main exponent of the natural law tradition – Thomas Aquinas.

Author Biographies

Lucas Fonseca dos Santos, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Mestrando em Filosofia na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Membro do Grupo de Pesquisa (CNPq) Tradição da Lei Natural, coordenado pelo Prof. Dr. Victor Sales Pinheiro. Graduado em Direito pelo Centro Universitário do Pará (CESUPA). Porto Alegre, RS, BR.

Mário da Silva Ribeiro, Instituto de Ensino de Segurança do Pará

Professor de Direito no Instituto de Ensino de Segurança do Pará (IESP).  Professor de Filosofia dos Direitos Humanos, Bioética e Teologia do Matrimônio na Faculdade Católica de Belém (FACBEL). Doutorando   e   Mestre   em Direito, com   ênfase   em   Ética   e   Filosofia   do   Direito, pela Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA). Graduado em Direito pela Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA). Belém, PA, BR.

Victor Sales Pinheiro, Universidade Federal do Pará

Professor no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Federal do Pará (PPGD-UFPA). Coordenador   do   Grupo   de   Pesquisa Tradição   da   Lei   Natural (CNPq). Doutor   em   Filosofia pela Universidade   do   Estado   do   Rio   de   Janeiro (UERJ).   Mestre   em   Filosofia   pela   Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO). Graduado em Direito pelo CESUPA. Graduado em Direito pelo Centro Universitário do Pará (CESUPA). Belém, PA, BR.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-24

How to Cite

SANTOS, Lucas Fonseca dos; RIBEIRO, Mário da Silva; PINHEIRO, Victor Sales. THE FIRST PRINCIPLE OF PRACTICAL REASON IN THOMAS AQUINAS: THE CONTEMPORARY DEBATE ON THE STARTING POINT OF NATURAL LAW. Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza), Fortaleza, v. 22, n. 40, p. 25–44, 2024. DOI: 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v22i40.p25-44.2024. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/5073. Acesso em: 7 jun. 2026.

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 40 (2024)

Section

Artigos Originais

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright and Licensing

According to the current submission policy, authors retain the rights to their works and grant the Revista Opinião Jurídica the right of first publication, with commercial rights reserved by the publisher under the terms of the non-commercial license used. Revista Opinião Jurídica uses a Creative Commons license. The works published are under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-SA).

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:

 BY: credit must be given to the creator.
 NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
 SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.

RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENT

By submitting an article, the author(s) declare to have sole responsibility for the content of the piece and is(are), therefore, responsible for any judicial or extrajudicial measures referring to it.

1. In case of joint authorship, all authors are considered collectively responsible, except when proved otherwise.