THE FINANCIAL CONDITION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE LAW AND ITS CONTROL BY THE FEDERAL COURT OF ACCOUNTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i33.p1-30.2022Keywords:
Federal Court of Accounts, Executive, Legislative, Ineffectiveness of the LawAbstract
Objective: this article sought to analyze the institutional posture of the Federal Audit Court from the understanding of its powers and how it has expanded its political-administrative role through not only the activities of control and supervision of public policies approved and implemented, but especially through the financial control of the effectiveness of the law and, therefore, of the Legislature itself.
Method: the theoretical research of the legal-dogmatic type was developed from the study of the paradigmatic judgment of 1907/2019, issued by the Federal Court of Auditors, as well as the examination of constitutional and infra-constitutional normativity focused on public finances, dialoguing with works doctrinaires that exemplify the state of the art applicable to the subject and object in the scope of financial and constitutional law.
Result: it was considered, in the end, that the Legislative Power, through budget legislation, self-limited by its institutional choices in public finance, is originally responsible for controlling the financial condition of the effectiveness of the law, without prejudice to the autonomous body After all, taking into account the legislative self-limitation reinforced in recent years by the constitutional textuality, check the effectiveness of legislative acts that mobilize public resources as an adequate mechanism, including the reinforcement of the dialogic preservation of the autonomy and harmony of the Powers.
Contribution: the main contribution of this study consists in pointing out the insufficiency of the analytical tools offered by contemporary legal-financial dogmatics - and its historical legacy - to promote the reflective deepening of the theme opened by Judgment No. 1907/2019, in order to indicate, in the form of three integrated programmatic theses, directions that the doctrine must accept with constructive institutional imagination, since the epistemic field of financial law does not systematically contemplate the aforementioned political-administrative protagonism of the Court of Auditors of the Union.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licensing
According to the current submission policy, authors retain the rights to their works and grant the Revista Opinião Jurídica the right of first publication, with commercial rights reserved by the publisher under the terms of the non-commercial license used. Revista Opinião Jurídica uses a Creative Commons license. The works published are under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-SA).
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:
BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENT
By submitting an article, the author(s) declare to have sole responsibility for the content of the piece and is(are), therefore, responsible for any judicial or extrajudicial measures referring to it.
1. In case of joint authorship, all authors are considered collectively responsible, except when proved otherwise.
