Fraternity causes
a conceptual investigation
Keywords:
fraternity, alterity, recognition, golden rule, communityAbstract
Contextualization: Fraternity is one of the key concepts in the ethical horizon of modernity, with the first article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) as the landmark of its universal adherence. In Brazil, fraternity appears in the preamble of the 1988 Federal Constitution.
Goal: This article aims, with a conceptual investigation based on the Aristotle’s four causes theory, to clarify the concept of fraternity through its insertion within a conceptual network composed of the concepts of alterity, recognition, golden rule and community, which correspond respectively to its material, efficient, formal and final cause.
Method: By decomposing the concept of fraternity into its main constituent elements (“causes”), it is possible to conclude the necessity of a “circular” analysis, because those elements cannot be defined independently.
Results: Thus, adopting the aforementioned circular analysis model, alterity, recognition, golden rule and community are mutually referent: each of the four concepts can only be fully grasped in the light of the other three.
Conclusions: In this sense, fraternity exists when there is reciprocal recognition (community) of human beings as people (alterity), according to a procedure of practical reason known as the golden rule.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CESSION OF COPYRIGHTS
The submission of articles to analysis for publication on Opinião Jurídica implies the author(s) transfers copyrights to Centro Universitário Christus – UNICHRISTUS for reproduction, publicizing, distribution, printing and publication, according to the Publication Norm 414R, Opin. Jur., Fortaleza, year 12, n. 16, p.1-414, Jan./Dec. 2014, costs to be bore by UNICHRISTUS, in whatever format or means that may or shall exist, in accordance to articles 49 and following of Federal Law 9.610/98.
1. In ceding copyrights, the author(s) agrees to do so in exclusivity, free of charge and for the totality of the work.
2. UNICHRISTUS may make the work, in its entirety or in parts, available for scholarly purposes, without altering its contents, except for small corrections that are deemed necessary.
3. The cession of copyrights is valid in all countries and for versions of the material in its original language or translated into a foreign language.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENT
By submitting an article, the author(s) declare to have sole responsibility for the content of the piece and is(are), therefore, responsible for any judicial or extrajudicial measures referring to it.
1. In case of joint authorship, all authors are considered collectively responsible, except when proved otherwise.