COMPLIANCE TO LEGAL PRECEDENTS AND REPETITIVE LEGAL CASES MANAGEMENT WITH MACHINE LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i28.p69-93.2020Keywords:
E-Judiciary, Civil jurisdiction, Machine learning, Electronic process, Legal precedents systemAbstract
Brazilian Judiciary is presented as one of the focus of discussion on the implementation of technologies related to Artificial Intelligence (AI), from which comes the machine learning (ML). In this context, the research problem is presented: is it possible that machine learning contributes to the functioning of the legal precedents system? Starting from an initial positive hypothesis, and using the inductive method, the article presents a study of two cases, with data collection about two procedural institutes: one about the non-compliance to legal precedents,
the “Reclamação” [sic]; and another about the techniques for management of repetitive cases, the “Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas (IRDR)” [sic]. In order to contextualize the theme and objectives of the study, the research presents the evolution of the concept of jurisdiction, referring to the changes brought by the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure (2015), and still the notions of E-Judiciary and e-jurisdiction combined with the functionalities of AI, as well as related work using ML. Thus, the proposed ML applications are based on the
identification of these two procedural institutes, related to the operation of the legal precedence system, which can be improved with the implementation of the technology to achieve a model of intelligent civil jurisdiction.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CESSION OF COPYRIGHTS
The submission of articles to analysis for publication on Opinião Jurídica implies the author(s) transfers copyrights to Centro Universitário Christus – UNICHRISTUS for reproduction, publicizing, distribution, printing and publication, according to the Publication Norm 414R, Opin. Jur., Fortaleza, year 12, n. 16, p.1-414, Jan./Dec. 2014, costs to be bore by UNICHRISTUS, in whatever format or means that may or shall exist, in accordance to articles 49 and following of Federal Law 9.610/98.
1. In ceding copyrights, the author(s) agrees to do so in exclusivity, free of charge and for the totality of the work.
2. UNICHRISTUS may make the work, in its entirety or in parts, available for scholarly purposes, without altering its contents, except for small corrections that are deemed necessary.
3. The cession of copyrights is valid in all countries and for versions of the material in its original language or translated into a foreign language.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENT
By submitting an article, the author(s) declare to have sole responsibility for the content of the piece and is(are), therefore, responsible for any judicial or extrajudicial measures referring to it.
1. In case of joint authorship, all authors are considered collectively responsible, except when proved otherwise.