THE ADVERSARIAL STRUCTURE OF THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION: ANALISYS AFTER THE LAW N. 13.964/2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i32.p1-31.2021Keywords:
Adversarial System, Criminal Investigation, Judge of Guarantees, Prosecution Office, ImpartialityAbstract
Objective: This paper recognizes the adversarial structure of the criminal investigation on the Law 13.964/2019, supports its constitutionality and clarify possible hermeneutical antinomies.
Methodology: It uses the deductive and analytical legal hermeneutic methodology and the technic of systematic interpretation, using the theory of the adversarial system.
Results: It recognizes three relevant aspects on the Law reform: (i) the judge of guarantees; (ii) the interdiction of judicial control of the decision of closing the investigation; and (iii) the interdiction of judicial initiative for the new plea bargaining. It refutes the arguments of unconstitutionality used in a preliminary decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court.
Contributions: The interdiction of judicial ex officio initiative during the criminal investigation raises his objective impartiality. The prosecution office is the manager of the criminal investigation, closing internally the investigation and celebrating outside court the plea bargaining. Both the inquired person and the victim have new rights. The paper indicates topics of necessary hermeneutical adjustment.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CESSION OF COPYRIGHTS
The submission of articles to analysis for publication on Opinião Jurídica implies the author(s) transfers copyrights to Centro Universitário Christus – UNICHRISTUS for reproduction, publicizing, distribution, printing and publication, according to the Publication Norm 414R, Opin. Jur., Fortaleza, year 12, n. 16, p.1-414, Jan./Dec. 2014, costs to be bore by UNICHRISTUS, in whatever format or means that may or shall exist, in accordance to articles 49 and following of Federal Law 9.610/98.
1. In ceding copyrights, the author(s) agrees to do so in exclusivity, free of charge and for the totality of the work.
2. UNICHRISTUS may make the work, in its entirety or in parts, available for scholarly purposes, without altering its contents, except for small corrections that are deemed necessary.
3. The cession of copyrights is valid in all countries and for versions of the material in its original language or translated into a foreign language.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENT
By submitting an article, the author(s) declare to have sole responsibility for the content of the piece and is(are), therefore, responsible for any judicial or extrajudicial measures referring to it.
1. In case of joint authorship, all authors are considered collectively responsible, except when proved otherwise.